ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	43 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130701
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '17 at 11:59
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 86 2-Core 179 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 616 58% 484 Pts	64-Core 913 56% 913 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Lighting 15.4 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 18.9 13% 16.2 fps	MRender 20.8 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 107 16046485 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 65292092835461 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 740 (0D) Soft read error rate 45 45 86178534840725 (64) Unknown 0 0 6055 (AA) Unknown 0 0 3776 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 81 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 51 60132884504 (C2) HDA temperature 24 51 60132884504 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 16046485 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 107 107 -42241003356160 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 16046485 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 16046485 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 0 0 14 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5846 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2293 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2293 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3607	68.8% Good	Read 499 Write 239 Mixed 271 74% 337 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 18.1 87% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 60.8 80% 145 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 20GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 194 0 (03) Spinup time 162 147 8858 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 282 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 701 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 254 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 50 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2923 (C2) HDA temperature 123 96 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.9% Above average	Read 99.7 Write 94.7 Mixed 67 65% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.52 4K Mixed 0.28 103% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 60%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB 7,087 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4GB free Firmware: 04.01G02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 233 230 10333 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6382 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25164 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 57 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 50 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 193 193 22645 (C2) HDA temperature 112 98 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	38.5% Below average	Read 84.3 Write 50.1 Mixed 26.9 40% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.13 23% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 63%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB 1,735 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 127 Write 109 Mixed 96.8 138% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.13 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.11 16% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351R7BFR8A-H9 12x4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 12 of 12 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 30.9 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4.4 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	154x
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	152x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	131x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	174x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	96x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	61x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 98%, 24 samples	21x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback