Lenovo 20236

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 20236  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '22 at 12:54
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 159
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 387
43% 340 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3800) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3114
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.95% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.6 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.95%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAH20105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 457
Write 346
Mixed 392
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 23.2
93% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 102
123% 209 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$85
465GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 60
Mixed 58.8
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.5% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20236 Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback