Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 14 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 116 2-Core 223 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 551 43% 381 Pts	64-Core 599 37% 599 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 3A2D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 6.2 Reflection 38.3 Parallax 6.6 5% 17 fps	Splatting 0.2 0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8L 512GB 8,016 User benchmarks, average bench 147% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: L02C SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 176 122 51 88 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	140% Outstanding	Read 1,190 Write 871 Mixed 736 SusWrite 89.8 160% 722 MB/s	4K Read 51.4 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 65.6 223% 77.2 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 459 DQ Mixed 84.1 151% 293 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 189%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FR 1x16GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 12.5 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.3 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	670x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	530x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	202x

SSD
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GBBench 86%, 6,231 samples	184x
MZALQ512HALU-000L2 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,504 samples	156x
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GBBench 68%, 9,061 samples	131x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	340x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	304x
RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 1x16GBRamaxelBench 43%, 3,986 samples	192x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16