TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 305E4A/305E4A
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 00:55
Run Duration348 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3520M APU-$60
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 47.1
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 67
32% 50.3 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 112
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 33%
 Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Sanyo(144D C624) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 3.5
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3
Splatting 4
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.07%
 Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 201 207 200 210 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.3% Average
Read 200
Write 199
Mixed 200
SusWrite 200
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 19.4
65% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 122
101% 145 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 47.3%
 Great: 123%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB
222GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 26 27 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 23.9
Write 22.9
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 26.3
33% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 13%
 Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1333 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.7% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 32.7%
 Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A

CPU
A6-3420M APUAMDBench 36%, 4,510 samples30x
A4-3305M APUAMDBench 31%, 1,486 samples11x
A8-3520M APUAMD  $60Bench 38%, 1,349 samples4x
GPU
Radeon HD 6520GAMDBench 2%, 8,067 samples31x
Radeon HD 6480GAMDBench 2%, 5,005 samples13x
Radeon HD 6620GAMDBench 3%, 3,311 samples4x
SSD
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples4x
UD PRO 256GBGigabyte  $49Bench 84%, 2,163 samples2x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung  $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples1x
RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5273CM0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 479 samples5x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples3x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback