Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 04:28
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 198
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 700
70% 569 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 112
Parallax 102
86% 107 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 102
Splatting 98.7
81% 98.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 808 809 807 809 804 798 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 941
Write 789
Mixed 686
SusWrite 806
181% 806 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 41.1
132% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 413
DQ Write 372
DQ Mixed 386
291% 390 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 146%
Great: 332%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$120
477GB free
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1539 1546 1544 1546 1541 1534 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,085
Write 1,265
Mixed 907
SusWrite 1,542
323% 1,450 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 54.4
196% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 719
DQ Mixed 817
621% 842 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 276%
Great: 353%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
3GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 22 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 26.1
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 21.8
37% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 3.5
257% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 49.1
MC Mixed 40
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $508
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback