Today's hottest deals

ARLT Mr. Business VI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemARLT Mr. Business VI  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 14:03
Run Duration467 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 75.6
41% 61.8 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 170
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.9% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 34.8
27% 35.7 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 26.8
27% 34 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 95 127 73 28 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.2% Very poor
Read 208
Write 140
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 74.1
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.8
16% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 86%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0004
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.3
Write 33.1
Mixed 31.1
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
123% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 69%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
212GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 77 76 78 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48% Average
Read 91.3
Write 89
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 75.7
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48%
Great: 96%
Seagate BUP BL 5TB
625GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 2.3 2.1 2.5 1.8 7.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.2
Write 8.4
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 4
6% 7.62 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.6
17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$86
112GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 32 32 31 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 108
Write 31.9
Mixed 38
SusWrite 30.9
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 75%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
58GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 16 16 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 30
Write 32.5
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 14.4
19% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
296GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 32 34 32 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 31.5
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 30.1
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
578GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.2 6.4 6.2 6.5 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.66% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 10.9
Mixed 15.4
SusWrite 6.3
11% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.66%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
406GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 29 30 30 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 65.7
Write 21.2
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 29.4
25% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion+ 5TB
42GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 5.8 4.1 3.8 2.7 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Read 17
Write 12
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 3.8
8% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
42% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 69 42 89 69 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 124
Write 91.8
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 61.8
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 84%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
360GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 1.6 1.1 1.1 1 1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 21.9
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 1.5
20% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.8
Write 11.8
Mixed 8.5
17% 16 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.6
78% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Intenso External USB 3.0 500GB
4GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 11 13 13 13 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 27.3
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 12.5
25% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 43%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB
5GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 8.9 8.8 8.7 8.5 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 7.7
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 8.7
20% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 49%
WD My Passport 0740 500GB
2GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 9.9 10 10 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 28.8
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 11.3
30% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 36%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
1GB free, PID 2351
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.9
Write 23.1
Mixed 19.7
28% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 21%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
0GB free, PID 0716
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.1
Write 11.2
Mixed 7.2
14% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 17%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
778GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 8 8 7.7 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 22.7
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 8.1
25% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 67%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB
4GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 9.7 11 10 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 28.1
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 11.7
31% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.2% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mr. Business VI Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: ARLT Mr. Business VI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback