Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac17,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B809C3757DA9BB8D
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 15:31
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 681
72% 578 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R9 M395X
Apple(106B 014D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 909 MHz, MLim: 1365 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.45.40.15
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.7% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 52.9
33% 44.8 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 27.9
29% 37 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM1024G PCIe 1TB
875GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXZ53A0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1412 1382 1327 1247 1397 1451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,426
Write 1,293
Mixed 891
SusWrite 1,369
280% 1,245 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 26.2
132% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 452
DQ Mixed 578
419% 547 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 203%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31364B544631473634485A2D314739503220 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback