bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory123 GB free of 128 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2558 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '22 at 21:51
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3245
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 242
75% 141 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 913
80% 680 Pts
64-Core 2,270
140% 2,270 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 17.1.2.51548
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 126
49% 85.9 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 81.4
62% 75.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 550GB
414GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 598 779 670 340 366 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 2,834
Write 1,743
Mixed 1,804
SusWrite 546
384% 1,732 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 29.6
100% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 378
282% 377 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 194%
Great: 301%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 56.1
MC Write 76
MC Mixed 56.7
180% 62.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 8.8
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 150%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback