Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 98 2-Core 172 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 686 62% 520 Pts	64-Core 871 54% 871 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	7.36% Terrible	Lighting 7.9 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 8.1 6% 10.9 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 10.6 9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.36% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB 17,953 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 856GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 54 45 53 217 264 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 471 Write 361 Mixed 214 SusWrite 140 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 9.5 44% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 92.7 DQ Mixed 30.2 42% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 106%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 3.5TB free Firmware: AA50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 167 170 171 172 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 175 Mixed 39.9 SusWrite 171 98% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 36JSF1G72PZ-1 36JSF2G72PZ-1 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.5% Good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 23.9 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

SSD
Burst 480GBPatriotBench 76%, 16,899 samples	4x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $182Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	3x
840 250GBSamsungBench 77%, 2,100 samples	2x

RAM
36KSF2G72PZ-1 36KSF2G72PZ-1 18KSF1G72PDZ- 18KSF1G72PDZ- 48GBMicronBench 67%, 3 samples	3x
36JSF2G72PZ-1 2x16GBMicronBench 55%, 174 samples	2x
9965525-026.A 8x8GBKingstonBench 62%, 3 samples	2x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $193