Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 30 '22 at 11:27
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 107
52% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 202
25% 191 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.3% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 42.9
Parallax 38.3
32% 40.2 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 34.2
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 262 255 259 267 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 444
Write 415
Mixed 350
SusWrite 256
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 37.4
119% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 216
164% 221 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
48GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 95 94 96 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 94.1
Write 86.7
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 94.1
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
92GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 86 83 85 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 69.9
Write 73.5
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 84.8
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
266GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 109 106 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 87
Write 85.5
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 107
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.7% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback