Dell OptiPlex 9020

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell OptiPlex 9020
Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex 9020 (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190530
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 04 '22 at 15:31
Run Duration	314 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 181 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 396 53% 396 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6255) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.04 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.4% Poor	Lighting 36.8 Reflection 42.5 Parallax 39.1 30% 39.5 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 28.4 28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 1TB 2,531 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 569GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 901 485 485 483 486 481 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 116%
WDC WD140EDGZ-11 14TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2TB free Firmware: 0A85 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 125 127 127 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 126 Write 131 Mixed 134 SusWrite 127 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 1.2 23% 6.97 MB/s	DQ Read 1.8 DQ Write 7.5 DQ Mixed 3.4 3% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 25%
WDC WD140EDFZ-11 14TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 916GB free Firmware: 0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 110 97 108 109 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 194 Write 200 Mixed 170 SusWrite 107 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 1.4 25% 7.47 MB/s	DQ Read 2.3 DQ Write 7.7 DQ Mixed 3.2 3% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 28%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 2,620 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 9TB free Firmware: 0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 204 199 201 208 205 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
WD easystore 264D 12TB 733 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1TB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 116 118 117 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 115 Write 122 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 116 139% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 1 354% 3.77 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 5.3 DQ Mixed 1.3 227% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 103%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 124 120 122 124 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 160 Write 176 Mixed 122 SusWrite 122 196% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.1 211% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 1TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 117 115 119 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 194 Write 204 Mixed 134 SusWrite 119 216% 163 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 0.9 320% 3.97 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 5.8 DQ Mixed 0.9 232% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 99%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 114 109 117 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 102 Write 116 Mixed 82 SusWrite 117 143% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.3 217% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 940GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 106 107 104 107 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 196 Write 208 Mixed 84 SusWrite 106 192% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.8 201% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB 8,984 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	61.7% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 20.3 62% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 19.2 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OptiPlex 9020 Builds (Compare 10,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9020

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	3,481x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	2,232x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	1,857x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	3,564x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	714x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	686x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	392x
KingFast 1TBBench 95%, 2,943 samples	233x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	215x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	256x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	182x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	177x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16