Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191125
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '22 at 04:15
Run Duration	455 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 70.2 1-Core 149 2-Core 294 90% 171 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 1,143 102% 862 Pts	64-Core 2,939 182% 2,939 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000D 1,102 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Nvidia(10DE 096F) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	7.18% Terrible	Lighting 8 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 11.3 6% 10 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 9.3 8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.18% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB 11,818 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 791GB free (System drive) Firmware: STNSC014 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2789 2664 2691 2213 954 1123 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	300% Outstanding	Read 2,136 Write 2,497 Mixed 2019 SusWrite 2,072 493% 2,181 MB/s	4K Read 50.3 4K Write 59 4K Mixed 58.3 182% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,299 DQ Write 95.6 DQ Mixed 192 267% 529 MB/s
Poor: 177% ↑ This bench: 300% Great: 492%
Ts1tssd3 70S 1TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 766GB free Firmware: O091 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 56 54 53 57 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 466 Write 414 Mixed 268 SusWrite 55.8 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 31.4 103% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 80.6 DQ Mixed 55.8 64% 113 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 112%
WDC WD140EDFZ-11 14TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 3TB free Firmware: 0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 35 46 31 45 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 127 Write 67.3 Mixed 118 SusWrite 44.1 20% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 0.1 20% 6.3 MB/s	DQ Read 5.6 DQ Write 9.2 DQ Mixed 6.5 5% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 28%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 69 78 57 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 457 Write 415 Mixed 310 SusWrite 67.7 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 37.1 128% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 156 125% 176 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 115%
WD WD120EMAZ-11BLFA0 12TB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 254GB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 141 141 138 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 90.2 Write 86.9 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 138 72% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 1.1 301% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 114%
WD WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 74GB free Firmware: 83.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 88 94 98 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 106%
WD WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 71GB free Firmware: 83.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 95 93 102 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 90.9 Write 94.7 Mixed 46.9 SusWrite 97.4 60% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.8 237% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 106%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 102 102 110 103 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2TB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 102 102 110 103 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 121 116 126 118 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 102 102 110 103 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 102 102 109 103 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD WD140EDFZ-11A0VA 14TB 528 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: 0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 127 130 140 130 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 116%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 17TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 89 79 94 85 93 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 105%
Seagate ST14000NE0008-2JK101 14TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 3TB free Firmware: EN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 132 131 142 132 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 83%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB 3,390 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 20GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 115 113 119 119 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 100 Write 104 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 112 131% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 1.1 323% 3.73 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 5.6 DQ Mixed 1.5 243% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 2,128 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.8% Very good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 27.3 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 26.1 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	507x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	488x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	362x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	189x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	162x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	112x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	100x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $691

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16