Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570S GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '23 at 14:13
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$158
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 172
2-Core 344
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 666
8-Core 1,101
108% 883 Pts
64-Core 1,421
88% 1,421 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
Gigabyte(1458 2406) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 144
Parallax 238
97% 167 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 125
Splatting 190
147% 179 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 111%
Great: 115%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1604 1603 1637 1614 1223 1579 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,721
Write 1684
Mixed 1,260
SusWrite 1,543
349% 1,552 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 71.6
238% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 915
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 272
269% 453 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 261%
Great: 295%
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
642GB free
Firmware: UH450400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 140 206 198 202 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 457
Write 371
Mixed 171
SusWrite 191
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 10.1
53% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 19.5
36% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 106%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
93GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,582
Write 1,654
Mixed 1,301
338% 1512 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 60
198% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,252
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 267
302% 550 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
722GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3053 3041 2949 3061 3021 2699 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 4,299
Write 3,368
Mixed 2812
SusWrite 2,970
753% 3,362 MB/s
4K Read 75.2
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 67.2
240% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,524
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 253
329% 634 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 464%
Great: 623%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$50
224GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 50.9
Write 40.2
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 20.1
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 114%
WD WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 41.6
Write 41.7
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 20.1
26% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.2
309% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1829BS.005 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.8
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.9
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 39.5
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570S GAMING X Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,056
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback