Asus H81-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H81-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '22 at 16:39
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 221
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 287
38% 288 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$267
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 93.6
Parallax 106
90% 103 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 106
Splatting 85.4
86% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 205 188 174 170 169 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73.5% Very good
Read 259
Write 218
Mixed 216
SusWrite 184
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 39.2
140% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 170
134% 184 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
285GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 180 183 179 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 177
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 177
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
205GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 165 166 167 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 148
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 170
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR16N11/8-SP 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81-PLUS Builds (Compare 854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-PLUS - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback