Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H170M-HD3 DDR3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H170M-HD3 DDR3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170M-HD3 DDR3-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 16:45
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$41
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 399
54% 399 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3085 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.3% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 57.3
50% 68.9 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 49.9
46% 57.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 266 289 286 257 275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 413
Mixed 350
SusWrite 280
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 45.9
150% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 204
162% 233 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 124%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
105GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 224 197 276 252 262 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 494
Write 403
Mixed 352
SusWrite 245
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 28.9
103% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 94.8
DQ Mixed 169
138% 203 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$37
107GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 101 102 98 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 62.4
Write 60.6
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 99.7
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 69%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
321GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 69 69 67 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 65.1
Write 63.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 68.6
80% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 8502 PSD38G16002 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.5
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170M-HD3 DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170M-HD3 DDR3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $118
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback