Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H170M-HD3 DDR3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H170M-HD3 DDR3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170M-HD3 DDR3-CF  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 14:34
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 198
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 376
45% 347 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3075 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.1% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 55.8
48% 49.6 fps
MRender 57.2
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 48.6
43% 53.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 283 291 290 290 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 471
Mixed 379
SusWrite 302
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 61.2
203% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 316
238% 319 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
320GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 231 273 285 279 285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 470
Mixed 370
SusWrite 295
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 37.6
139% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 188
178% 277 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
386GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 110 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 111
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 209 202 214 210 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 156
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 210
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 8502 PSD38G16002 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 22.6
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170M-HD3 DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170M-HD3 DDR3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback