Asus N750JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N750JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N750JK
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 22:03
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 186
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 461
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 129D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 7.1
3% 9.23 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 126 117 74 81 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 431
Write 269
Mixed 100
SusWrite 102
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 30.7
101% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 186
164% 242 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 93%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
842GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 107 105 104 85 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 53.3
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 93.7
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R538G1601S2SL 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N750JK Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N750JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback