Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive12.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '22 at 14:11
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 91.3
46% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 252
28% 219 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
ASRock(1849 03D6) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS311 120GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 42 36 18 27 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 10.8
Write 98.2
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 26.5
8% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 9.5
28% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 39.1
DQ Mixed 34.3
26% 35.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 45%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
931GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 180 176 148 175 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 186
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 166
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
368GB free
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 156 137 155 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 135
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 145
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TS512MLK64V3H 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.2% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback