Today's hottest deals

Lenovo F0CC0000US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo F0CC0000US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Gardenia CRB
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 22:27
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9210 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 77.8
46% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 70.3
8-Core 73.7
10% 72 Pts
64-Core 70.6
4% 70.6 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Legend(17AA 36BE) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 16.6
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.6% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.1
2% 3.67 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.4
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.6%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 13.1
Write 44.5
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 35
23% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
42% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 2.1
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0CC0000US Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0CC0000US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback