Acer Nitro N50-640

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-640  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-640
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211214
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 09 '22 at 21:21
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$133
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 186
2-Core 368
112% 213 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 1,026
100% 823 Pts
64-Core 1,212
75% 1,212 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283
Sapphire(174B A630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 122
Parallax 126
110% 128 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 104
Splatting 90.5
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1434 1586 1296 307 370 374 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,610
Write 1554
Mixed 1469
SusWrite 895
311% 1,382 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 80.8
280% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,156
DQ Write 916
DQ Mixed 1,022
769% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 252%
Great: 253%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
748GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 468 469 457 424 431 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 477
Mixed 423
SusWrite 447
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 35.3
126% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 336
254% 340 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
786GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 70 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 76.6
Write 76.6
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 70.3
88% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 43%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00SPEB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 0.5 0.5 1.6 3.5 2.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 71.6
Write 72.2
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 1.9
66% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 71 71 71 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 168
Write 178
Mixed 108
SusWrite 69.9
171% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 66%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
360GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 0.5 0.6 1.6 3.5 2.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 124
Write 135
Mixed 111
SusWrite 1.9
120% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2B1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
95% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 30.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 28.5
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-640 Builds (Compare 1,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Acer Nitro N50-640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $416
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback