Today's hottest deals

Colorful Battle Axe C.B360M-HD PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemColorful Battle Axe C.B360M-HD PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful Battle Axe C.B360M-HD PRO
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190523
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '22 at 13:28
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 714
74% 595 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 377 375 377 381 376 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 496
Write 347
Mixed 355
SusWrite 375
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 26.4
123% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 38.9
82% 162 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 90%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
374GB free
Firmware: 02.03B05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 111
Write 109
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 64%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
233GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 121 122 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 121
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 25.4
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 60.1
66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Battle Axe C.B360M-HD PRO Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Colorful Battle Axe C.B360M-HD PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback