Today's hottest deals

Intel X79G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel X79
MotherboardIntel X79G  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '21 at 04:35
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 129
55% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 608
54% 458 Pts
64-Core 946
58% 946 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 36B8) 1GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 0.3
1% 3.4 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 83 97 103 85 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 474
Write 22.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 102
33% 155 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 11.4
34% 8.83 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79G Builds (Compare 916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback