Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '22 at 17:32
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 55.6
2-Core 103
51% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 294
29% 237 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 63.1
53% 65.6 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 64.2
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssdpr-cl 100-120 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 45 38 51 51 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.8% Poor
Read 92.8
Write 53.8
Mixed 55
SusWrite 45.2
14% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 8.6
44% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 36.1
DQ Mixed 13.5
15% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
70GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 144 145 149 134 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 157
Write 150
Mixed 66
SusWrite 139
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1333M/4G0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.4
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback