Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 195%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics207% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211005
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '22 at 19:02
Run Duration437 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$270
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 185
2-Core 345
107% 203 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 1,114
104% 866 Pts
64-Core 1,660
103% 1,660 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
207% Outstanding
Lighting 306
Reflection 264
Parallax 312
250% 294 fps
MRender 340
Gravity 252
Splatting 180
202% 257 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 207%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,666
Write 2,315
Mixed 1,806
503% 2,263 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 89.2
298% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,336
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 1,148
869% 1,172 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
1TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 486 486 482 458 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 480
Mixed 454
SusWrite 475
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 62.5
208% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 338
255% 343 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 486 485 485 487 485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 485
Mixed 439
SusWrite 485
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 62.9
208% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 338
255% 343 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
37GB free
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 222 248 222 225 222 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 251
Mixed 267
SusWrite 233
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 42.3
158% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 152
143% 222 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 91%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
189GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1359 309 309 309 311 310 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,079
Write 1,488
Mixed 625
SusWrite 485
258% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 54.4
215% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1,170
DQ Write 1,119
DQ Mixed 701
648% 997 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 229%
Great: 236%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
367GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 165 165 163 163 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 117
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 163
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 91%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
953GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 141 140 141 142 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 124
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 140
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
717GB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 115 113 117 114 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 101
Write 125
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 116
127% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZ 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZ 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 20.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE AC Builds (Compare 3,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback