Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME B360-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B360-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '22 at 12:35
Run Duration369 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 272
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 1,109
98% 829 Pts
64-Core 1,535
95% 1,535 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 8.6
5% 8.07 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 0.2
4% 6.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
457GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 736 142 240 408 155 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1348
Write 1,189
Mixed 882
SusWrite 329
209% 937 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 65.7
236% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 965
DQ Write 667
DQ Mixed 296
362% 643 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 183%
Great: 282%
Asmt 2115 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 82 79 80 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 115
Write 113
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 79.9
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 105%
Asmt 2115 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 119 122 121 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 167
Write 154
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 120
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 105%
Asmt 2115 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 122 122 121 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 170
Write 160
Mixed 124
SusWrite 121
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 105%
Asmt 2115 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 92 93 95 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 86
SusWrite 92.5
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 105%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 33 31 37 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 40.2
Mixed 29
SusWrite 35.8
48% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
18% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 43%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.6 1.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.7% Terrible
Read 2
Write 1.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1.9
3% 1.9 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2666HLB-16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 25.2
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B360-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B360-PLUS - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback