Today's hottest deals

Asus Maximus III Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Maximus III Formula  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20101215
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateSep 05 '17 at 22:25
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$290
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 141
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 356
38% 305 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
EVGA(3842 1589) 1.5GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1049 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 359.6
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 33.9
25% 37.2 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 34
27% 32.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9065 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.6% Poor
Read 115
Write 79
Mixed 79.8
20% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 11.1
50% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 29.4
DQ Mixed 9.73
11% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 126%
Patriot Inferno 120GB
67GB free
Firmware: 320A13F0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28% Poor
Read 141
Write 69.6
Mixed 92.1
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 7.09
56% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 79.4
DQ Mixed 7.11
18% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 28%
Great: 70%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$135
188GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 88.7
Mixed 83.5
70% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.24
84% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$135
96GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 155
Mixed 110
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.21
101% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$135
38GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 89.9
Mixed 79.6
67% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.26
99% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 99%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB
236GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.5% Average
Read 112
Write 89.5
Mixed 69.7
110% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.46
4K Mixed 0.3
96% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 43%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB
127GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
Read 123
Write 101
Mixed 96.6
133% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.88
4K Mixed 0.3
112% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49%
Great: 43%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
97GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 86.3
Write 75.4
Mixed 34.6
78% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.11
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.09
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%
HGST HDN 726060ALE610 6TB
73GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45% Average
Read 129
Write 102
Mixed 61
116% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.5
62% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus III Formula Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Maximus III Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback