Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H-MVP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H-MVP  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 00:42
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2120 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 86
2-Core 129
60% 97 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 215
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V4900-$150
AMD(1002 2B06) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1010
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.72% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 7.1
7% 8.33 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 7.3
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.72%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-sabe R1000 480GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 308 366 291 318 274 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 373
Write 377
Mixed 252
SusWrite 320
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 30.1
108% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 190
161% 239 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF Kingston 9905584-015.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77M-D3H-MVP Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H-MVP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback