Asus H61M-A/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H61M-A/BR  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '22 at 02:48
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 121
57% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 132
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 55 55 64 63 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 82
Write 80.8
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 58
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 62%
Samsung HN-M500MBB 500GB-$80
284GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.3 0.5 1.4 1.6 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 49.3
Write 9.8
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 1
13% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 60%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB
145GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 72
Write 11.8
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 72.4
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
DATEN 2G3D33 L0511 029E VS2GB1333D4 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-A/BR Builds (Compare 530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback