MSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7A15
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '17 at 16:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$48
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 309
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
MSI(1462 7A15) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4541
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.03
3% 3.99 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 8.26
5% 5.64 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 72.5
Write 58
Mixed 76.9
52% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.96
4K Mixed 0.47
140% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 42%
Virtual Disk 54GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 56
Write 72.2
Mixed 56.8
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.78
4K Write 5.88
4K Mixed 2.25
475% 3.64 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.5% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15) Builds (Compare 2,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $165
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback