Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M68MT-S2P  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '17 at 02:50
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270-$20
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 78
1-Core 49.3
2-Core 82.4
46% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 72.5
8-Core 84.8
10% 78.7 Pts
64-Core 93.6
6% 93.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
PwrHis(1787 6570) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1003
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 5.81
6% 6.39 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 5.09
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 320GB
231GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 42.8
Write 14.4
Mixed 24
20% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 44%
Virtual Disk 54GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
8.93% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 12.5
Mixed 15.5
12% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.15
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.23
35% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.93%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.7% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M68MT-S2P Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback