Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$132 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 105 2-Core 214 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 560 61% 481 Pts	64-Core 583 36% 583 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.01 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.33% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.7 Parallax 1.2 3% 3.63 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.33% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 123 12 37 47 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 446 Write 385 Mixed 382 SusWrite 97.5 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 0.5 38% 10 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.3% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 8.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 11.1 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	23x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	8x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 838 samples	8x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	7x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $405