Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 11:24
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4370-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 105
60% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 275
27% 220 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 40
Parallax 38
30% 38.2 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 27
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS300M240C 240GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0529A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.5 124 16 112 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.2% Poor
Read 207
Write 27.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 46.7
15% 72 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 10 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
123GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 141 160 160 160 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 140
Write 118
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 155
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-032.A00LF 99U5471-024.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2PV Builds (Compare 2,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback