MSI MS-16P7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GL63 8SD
MotherboardMSI MS-16P7  (all builds)
Memory15 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190114
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 13:25
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 221
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 705
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 126A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 7.8
5% 37.1 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 0.3
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ 512GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 92 100 114 133 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 660
Mixed 551
SusWrite 172
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 37.3
112% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 435
DQ Mixed 461
400% 606 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 148%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI26D4S9D8ME-16 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 19.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 23
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P7 Builds (Compare 1,600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback