Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4282A23

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4282A23  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4282A23
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 11:54
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 159
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 424
45% 358 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.1269
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6
Parallax 2
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk G5 BICS4 500GB
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 174 218 208 209 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 423
Write 344
Mixed 324
SusWrite 203
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 27.5
97% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 250
216% 321 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4282A23 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4282A23

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback