MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B77
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180318
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 13:53
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 674
65% 534 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3718) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.9% Above average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 69
Parallax 64.7
51% 65.5 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 64.7
53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 940 657 662 658 654 618 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,492
Write 2,218
Mixed 1,491
SusWrite 698
385% 1,725 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 81.2
266% 91.8 MB/s
DQ Read 792
DQ Write 701
DQ Mixed 745
559% 746 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 258%
Great: 340%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
317GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 118 118 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 82.1
Write 53.3
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 117
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 93 91 92 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 91.5
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.0 128GB-$60
48GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 216 209 207 209 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 248
Write 86
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 204
172% 144 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 8.3
697% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 10.1
806% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 97.7
Write 13.2
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 15.8
36% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
44% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 23%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
5GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.8 4.1 4.4 4.1 4.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Read 31.1
Write 5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 4.4
12% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 8%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
18GB free, PID 1f23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.8% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 15
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 16.8
22% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
38% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 11%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
11GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 18 9.9 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 115
Write 40
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 14.7
59% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.3
217% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29%
Great: 32%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
6GB free, PID 000d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.73% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 7.2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 7.6
13% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.73%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.6% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 25
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $889
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback