MSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI Z1-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 05:56
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 145
60% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 434
41% 341 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.8% Average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 98.4
41% 72.8 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 58.3
53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,023
Write 3,006
Mixed 3167
755% 3,399 MB/s
4K Read 335
4K Write 259
4K Mixed 107
781% 234 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 617
DQ Mixed 674
493% 643 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
31GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 81 86 76 79 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 60.1
Write 60.1
Mixed 46
SusWrite 77.9
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 62%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
97GB free
Firmware: SM30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 60 56 60 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 79.8
Write 74
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 58.1
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.9
365% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 65%
ST336032 0AS 360GB
22GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 14.8
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 10.6
23% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 25%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
453GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 26.6
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 10.7
30% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13%
Great: 21%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
11GB free, PID 000d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.6 5.6 5.3 5.9 5.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.96% Terrible
Read 19.1
Write 6.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.6
10% 8.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 8%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
11GB free, PID 00ee
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.1 8 8.1 8 7.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 7.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 8
9% 7.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.4% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641) - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback