MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220110
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 12:32
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 241
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 677
68% 550 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 128
Parallax 118
101% 124 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 127
Splatting 108
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 638 384 371 363 356 346 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,347
Write 1,065
Mixed 1,005
SusWrite 410
214% 957 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 79.7
259% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 804
609% 823 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 197%
Great: 302%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30
315GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 109 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 95.9
Write 99.2
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 109
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 61%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
91GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 68.5
Write 29.3
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 72.6
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
443GB free
Firmware: SBM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 118 120 119 119 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 61.9
Write 113
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 116
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.7
192% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 71%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 0921
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.9 2.6 2.9 4.6 7.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Read 30.3
Write 12.4
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 3.7
15% 14 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.2
79% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 8%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
94GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 60 60 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 56.2
Write 64.5
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 59.5
71% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD2 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 28.8
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 28.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $696
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback