Today's hottest deals

HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F6
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 21:20
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 58
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 61.1
34% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 111
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
HP(103C 82F6) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.17 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$100
47GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 109 79 81 75 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 314
Write 296
Mixed 250
SusWrite 114
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 14.9
73% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 161
118% 153 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 110%
Generic Externa 360GB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 34 33 33 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 17.9
Write 16.3
SusWrite 32
16% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 3.7
542% 3.5 MB/s
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
2GB free, PID 0cd1
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 4.2 3.6 22 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.57% Terrible
Read 45.4
Write 5.8
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 8.4
19% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
45% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Empty RMT3020EC58E9F1333 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 8,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback