Fujitsu FMVA45H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu FMVA45H  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB23
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime8 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 13:22
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 118
54% 88 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 199
24% 187 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C2) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BR128G 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0601D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 58 60 54 66 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 284
Write 72.2
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 63.1
27% 126 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 12.6
61% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 31.2
57% 110 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 69%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB
59GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 14 15 9.6 12 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
7.92% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 11.4
12% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
48% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.92%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 0443 RMT3170EB68F9W1600 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.6" 1280 720 LGD03D9
Typical FMVA45H Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVA45H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback