Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS R970power

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R970power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3488-A1
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 14:47
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4110
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 174
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 509
50% 411 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$793
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 196
Reflection 252
Parallax 287
160% 245 fps
MRender 312
Gravity 236
Splatting 172
188% 240 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 156%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1687 844 623 619 623 624 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,665
Write 1587
Mixed 1,338
SusWrite 837
304% 1,357 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 59.7
222% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 813
606% 813 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 222%
Great: 340%
Hitachi HUS722T1TALA604 1TB
886GB free
Firmware: RR04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 187 196 192 193 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 235
Mixed 116
SusWrite 193
128% 174 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
420% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 111%
Hitachi HUS722T1TALA604 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RR04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 192 201 198 199 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 215
Mixed 108
SusWrite 199
133% 182 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
369% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 116%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1K43BB1-CTD M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1K43BB1-CTD 32GB
2400, 2666, 2400, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 46.6
MC Mixed 27.1
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 9.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R970power Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R970power

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback