Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS R970power

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R970power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3488-A1
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 22:39
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4110
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 147
57% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 505
45% 382 Pts
64-Core 733
45% 733 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$793
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 246
Parallax 295
140% 238 fps
MRender 318
Gravity 235
Splatting 174
190% 242 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 146%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 589 603 603 596 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,627
Write 1,608
Mixed 1,216
SusWrite 633
285% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 48.1
157% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 429
316% 420 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 171%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
146GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 398 398 407 400 423 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 400
Write 415
Mixed 356
SusWrite 402
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 36.1
118% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 345
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HUS722T1TALA604 1TB
886GB free
Firmware: RR04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 183 191 187 187 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 224
Mixed 106
SusWrite 188
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
388% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 111%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SND3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 161 165 166 165 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 161
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 165
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1K43BB1-CTD M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1K43BB1-CTD 32GB
2400, 2666, 2400, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 47.5
MC Mixed 27.1
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R970power Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R970power

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback