Positivo G800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemPositivo G800  (all builds)
MotherboardPOSITIVO G800
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '17 at 00:22
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 29.4
2-Core 70.2
42% 60.2 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 107
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(1297 2033) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 2.59
3% 3.69 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 7.17
4% 4.29 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 500GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 54
Mixed 62.6
46% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.09
4K Mixed 0.04
8% 0.06 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FSFF65F-C8KL9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 6.1
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G800 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo G800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback