Today's hottest deals

Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics76.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 22:22
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 124
52% 86 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 563
46% 403 Pts
64-Core 1,240
77% 1,240 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 57%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.96
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.7% Very good
Lighting 93.7
Reflection 105
Parallax 96.5
76% 98.5 fps
MRender 93
Gravity 94.8
Splatting 95.2
77% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-128 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0629A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 291 83 83 66 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 909
Write 502
Mixed 457
SusWrite 121
110% 497 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 4.6
65% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 27.4
DQ Mixed 6.8
32% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 173%
SSD 512GB 512GB
58GB free
Firmware: S0110A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 4.7 193 4.3 4.4 4 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
5.51% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 4
Mixed 6
SusWrite 70.7
5% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.1
2% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 211%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$183
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 161 163 162 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 156
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 160
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 42.9
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.1
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback