Philco 14M-W549

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPhilco 14M-W549  (all builds)
Motherboard 14M-W549
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130911
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJun 03 '22 at 08:53
Run Duration413 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-70 APU (2012 M.Za)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Memory 24.9
1-Core 9.6
2-Core 8.3
11% 14.3 Pts
4-Core 15.3
8-Core 18.8
2% 17 Pts
64-Core 17.2
1% 17.2 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7290
Clevo(1558 4511) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGBOAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 11 11 8.3 8.9 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5% Terrible
Read 7.9
Write 10.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 9.4
6% 8.12 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron SH564568FJ8NZRNSDR 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.31% Terrible
MC Read 1.9
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.63 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.7 GB/s
Latency 287
14% 287 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14M-W549 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Philco 14M-W549

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback