MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GL62M 7REX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 17:58
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 171
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 473
49% 396 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 6.2
5% 17.5 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thnsn5128gpu7 TOSHIBA 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57XA4104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 349 358 317 317 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1,116
Write 542
Mixed 556
SusWrite 348
142% 640 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 44.4
141% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 697
DQ Write 470
DQ Mixed 409
352% 525 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 136%
Great: 176%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
137GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 56 55 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 121
Write 114
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 58.3
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
156% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.5% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback