HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15-da0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A6
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200731
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 10:23
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 165
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 282
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 84A6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.43 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.1
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NV900-128 128GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 96 155 145 126 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 992
Write 119
Mixed 73
SusWrite 125
70% 327 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 23.6
123% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 57.3
DQ Mixed 124
117% 192 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 173%
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
254GB free
Firmware: AM001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 89
Write 90.7
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 92.2
55% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.5
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-da0xxx Builds (Compare 4,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback