| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
| System | Gigabyte H310M A 2.0 |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20211110 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 15 '22 at 17:04 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77%
Very good
|
78% 139 Pts
|
58% 444 Pts
|
42% 671 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
39% 71 fps
|
9% 9.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 97 103 98 100 102 MB/s
|
74%
Very good
|
61% 272 MB/s
|
119% 41.6 MB/s
|
176% 260 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
762GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 113 112 114 114 115 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
60% 82.1 MB/s
|
117% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.M8FJ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
67.2%
Good
|
71% 25 GB/s
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
50% 80.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M A 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 540 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 201x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 80x |
| Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 33x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 43x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 41x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 32x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $386 |