Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160404
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 19:56
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$71
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 172
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 319
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
EVGA(3842 2619) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.43 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.8
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X2001T 1TB
539GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 108 223 221 218 141 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.5% Below average
Read 250
Write 226
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 153
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 39.7
DQ Mixed 0.5
26% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 105%
Asmt 2115 500GB
443GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 96 105 107 105 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 70
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 99.9
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 67%
HP External HDD 499GB
383GB free, PID 4507
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 11 16 16 15 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 27.6
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 13.2
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 19%
ST2000DM 008-2FR102 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 11 16 16 15 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Read 26.1
Write 25.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 13.2
30% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $96
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback