Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81LK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81LK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '22 at 03:58
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 21.1
2-Core 158
41% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 474
48% 391 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3A2E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.83 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 9.9
6% 6.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 100 134 110 110 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 666
Write 133
Mixed 136
SusWrite 116
57% 263 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 22.2
79% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 186
138% 185 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 173%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
114GB free
Firmware: LFM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 52 85 87 69 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 46.3
Write 73
Mixed 37
SusWrite 78.1
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0
24% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.6
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81LK Builds (Compare 6,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81LK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback