Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '22 at 04:13
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 62.5
2-Core 119
56% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 242
29% 222 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3660) 2GB
CLim: 1282 MHz, MLim: 1632 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.62
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 44.8
26% 36.6 fps
MRender 42.3
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 33.4
31% 39 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Inland S ATA SSD 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 372 281 191 160 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.3% Very good
Read 332
Write 378
Mixed 336
SusWrite 256
74% 326 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 31.9
118% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 82.2
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 138
112% 153 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
528GB free
Firmware: JEDOA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 77 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 78.8
Write 81.3
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 76.3
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 14
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback